Representing Unum Policy Holders

Contact Us Today
























Yes, please subscribe me to the Quadrino Schwartz Online Update, the firm's monthly newsletter.




QUADRINO SCHWARTZ OBTAINS CLASS CERTIFICATION AGAINST UNUM IN A NATIONAL CLASS ACTION SEEKING TO STOP ALLEGEDLY ILLEGAL CLAIM DENIALS

Quadrino Schwartz has obtained a ground-breaking ruling from a federal court certifying a class in a class action against UnumProvident, now called Unum. The federal Judge in Tennessee ruled on September 4, 2007 that Unum’s alleged “elaborate and corporate-wide scheme to illegally deny or terminate the long-term disability claims of thousands of disabled Americans” can be prosecuted as a class action.

The original lawsuit drafted and filed by Quadrino Schwartz in New York was adopted and used as the basis for all of the class actions that were merged into one case in Tennessee. The Court quoted substantially from that Quadrino Schwartz Complaint, and based the class certification decision on the legal theories and claims contained in that Complaint. The Court agreed to define the class of disabled victims as a very broad group of people who have had their claims denied or terminated by Unum’s subsidairies that have issued group policies and allegedly engaged in various unlawful claims practices. The class of people who may receive relief from this class action is defined as follows:

All plan participants and beneficiaries insured under ERISA-governed long-term disability insurance policies/ plans issued by UnumProvident and the insuring subsidiaries of UnumProvident throughout the United States who have had a long-term disability claim denied, terminated, or suspended on or after June 30, 1999 by UnumProvident or one or more of its insuring subsidiaries after being subjected to any of the practices alleged in the Complaint.

Quadrino Schwartz represents 4 of the 7 individual plaintiffs in the case who are now class representatives. Those 7 plaintiffs will now represent the interests of thousands of people across the country whose claims were terminated or denied by Unum’s alleged illegal scheme.

In the decision, Judge Curtis Collier, the Chief Judge in the Eastern District of Tennessee, detailed the many allegations of unlawful conduct alleged in the Complaint, including allegations that Unum sought to save money by budgeting the claims process, rewarding company employees, including in-house doctors, through compensation and bonuses for denying or terminating as many claims as possible, and creating secret documents which predicted in advance when claims would be terminated.

Important Links:

News and Updates

September 8th, 2007
Anatomy of the Unum Class Action: Persistence Pays Off

Now that Quadrino Schwartz has obtained class certification in a first-of-its-kind national class action against disability insurer UnumProvident (Unum), the firm looks back at the long and hard fought battle that has preceded this critical court ruling.
When the case was filed — 5 years ago — Evan Schwartz and Richard Quadrino could hardly have predicted […]

September 5th, 2007
QUADRINO SCHWARTZ OBTAINS CLASS CERTIFICATION AGAINST UNUM IN A NATIONAL CLASS ACTION SEEKING TO STOP ALLEGEDLY ILLEGAL CLAIM DENIALS

Quadrino Schwartz has obtained a ground-breaking ruling from a federal court certifying a class in a class action against UnumProvident, now called Unum. The federal Judge in Tennessee ruled on September 4, 2007 that Unum’s alleged “elaborate and corporate-wide scheme to illegally deny or terminate the long-term disability claims of thousands of disabled Americans” […]

September 5th, 2007
UNUMPROVIDENT SETTLED WITH STATE REGULATORS, AGREES TO RECONSIDER 215,000 DENIED DISABILITY CLAIMS

UnumProvident reached a settlement, as part of a multistate government investigation, to reconsider 215,000 denied disability claims. Quadrino & Schwartz began the fight […]

January 11th, 2005
Law Firm of Quadrino & Schwartz Announces Federal Court’s Rejection of UnumProvident’s Attempt to Transfer Class Action Venue

UnumProvident’s Defeat on Key Legal Point Will Require Company to Face Hearing on Class CertificationNEW YORK, Jan. 11, 2005 (PRIMEZONE) — In one of the class actions pending against UnumProvident, a Federal Court in Massachusetts rejected a last-minute tactical maneuver by UnumProvident that sought to avoid a class certification hearing in the State’s Superior Court. […]